Learning from cases - OncologyArticle

AnalysisDividing RuleWe’ve analysed the support we provided UK-based oncology members in over 300 cases between 2016 and 2023. This covered a variety of matters, including:

Claims – demands for monetary compensation that embodies allegations of negligence.

Potential claims – intimations from a claimant of a possible claim for compensation.

Complaints.

General Medical Council (GMC) investigations.

Local disciplinary procedures.

Inquests.

Reports.

Medicolegal advice.

We have studied all clinical negligence claims, including those defended, not pursued, and settled. We feel sharing our learnings about why patients decide to take action – and the reasons why claims are settled – is hugely valuable.In our analysis of cases, such as regulatory and complaint matters, we have identified common themes that may lead to a concern being raised about a clinician.
Vimeo Video
Claims
Dividing Rule 2Common themes in clinical negligence claims arising from private oncology practice included:

Delayed diagnosis of cancer or of metastatic disease – particularly bone metastases.

Incorrect diagnosis, leading to incorrect treatment.

Negligent management of neutropaenic sepsis or other complications of chemotherapy.

Negligence administration of chemotherapy – either incorrect dose or incorrect drug.

Failure to advise of the possible effects of chemotherapy or radiotherapy on fertility, and options available for preservation of fertility.

CTA Best Practice

Learning from cases - OncologyArticle - IntroductionArticle - AnalysisArticle - Case StudyArticle - Common themesArticle - Case Study 2Article - Oncology in the UK: top tips to minimise riskEnd Page