Medical Editors
Michael K. Brawer, MD
URIDEA
Seattle, WA
Herbert Lepor, MD
New York University School of Medicine
New York, NY
Associate Editors
David M. Albala, MD
Associated Medical Professionals
Syracuse, NY
LUGPA Honorary Editor
Juan A. Reyna, MD
Urology San Antonio
San Antonio, TX
Contributing Editors
Dean G. Assimos, MD
Arie S. Belldegrun, MD, FACS
Gordon A. Brown, DO, FACOS
Benjamin M. Brucker, MD
Michael B. Chancellor, MD
Raoul Concepcion, MD, FACS
Steven A. Kaplan, MD
Vahan S Kassabian, MD, FRCS(C), FACS
Stacy Loeb, MD
Randall B. Meacham, MD
J. Curtis Nickel, MD, FRCSC
Alan W. Partin, MD, PhD
David F. Penson, MD, MPH
Jacob Rajfer, MD
Claus G. Roehrborn, MD, FACS
Jonathan N. Rubenstein, MD, FACS
Ellen Shapiro, MD, FACS, FAAP
Kevin M. Slawin, MD
Michael Williams, MD
Statement of Editorial Purpose
Reviews in urology
is designed to review the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of a wide range of urologic conditions to help the busy, practicing urologist keep up to date with the rapidly evolving field of urology.
Published by
MedReviews®, LLC
247 W 35th Street, Suite 801
New York, NY 10001
Phone: 212-201-6860
Fax: 212-201-6850
www.medreviews.com
Publications
Merilee Croft
Director, Editorial Production
Managing Editor
Jeanette Simmons
Art Director
Client Services
Jeff Arnold
Vice President
Programming
Steven Black
Executive Vice President
Blaine Vella
Director of Client Services
Trenton Clark
Program Manager
Danielle Wagner
Traffic Manager
REVIEWS IN UROLOGY (ISSN 1523-6161 [print]; ISSN 2153-8182 [online]) is published 4 times a year by MedReviews®, LLC, 247 W 35th Street, Suite 801, New York, NY 10001. Copyright © 2014 by MedReviews®, LLC. Reproduction by magnetic, electronic, or other means is strictly prohibited by law. Violation of copyright will result in legal action. Fees may be subject to change. Reviews in Urology is an independent publication under the editorial control of MedReviews®, LLC and its editorial board. Scientific rigor is enforced through a process of review that evaluates information presented for fair balance, objectivity, independence, and relevance to educational need. All articles are reviewed by at least two experts in the field. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and are not attributable to the publisher, editor, editorial board, or advertisers of Reviews in Urology. The authors, editors, publisher, their servants, assigns, or agents, shall not be in any way liable for the currency of information or for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the publication. Clinical judgment must guide each physician in weighing the benefits of treatment against the risk of toxicity. Information in this publication should not be relied upon in the care of patients. The publisher cannot be held responsible for any injury or damage to persons or property from any use of methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in this publication. Although articles in this issue of the journal may contain discussion of investigational uses of agents that are not approved by the FDA, these are the views of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of MedReviews®, LLC. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for indications, contraindications, and warnings. MedReviews®, LLC does not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications. Every effort has been made by the authors and contributors to contact holders of copyright to obtain permission to reproduce copyrighted material. However, if any have been inadvertently overlooked, the publication will be pleased to make the necessary arrangements at the first opportunity. The appearance of advertising has no influence on editorial content or presentation and does not imply endorsement of products by the publication or its editors.
Reprint Requests: Please contact Merilee Croft at 212-201-6860 or mcroft@medreviews.com.
This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper) effective with Volume 3, Issue 2, Spring 2001.